|
South Carolina MotorSports Racing News
www.SCMSRN.com |
Last Update: November 27, 2009 |
NASCAR, driving fans away?
I find it interesting, how other people feel about the
corporation of NASCAR. I’ve browsed the
web and are some of the comments I’ve found.
You can let me know how you feel by sending an email to pjm3@scmsrn.com.
Ric_P wrote on
11/27/2009 12:24:12 PM:
I
totally understand the view that NASCAR may have inadvertently neglected its
Southern fans, however, there is a major transformation in the sport that's
taking place that will blend many new fans. Juan Pablo Montoya is rapidly
becoming folklore in his native Colombia, and in many ways Colombian
nationalistic pride resembles Southern pride. Southerners are bright people
& will find this new coffee blend refreshing & long overdue.
amyintn
wrote on 11/27/2009 10:08:39 AM:
Times
change, and with it, NASCAR has changed. All our wishing and hoping will not
bring back the cars, drivers, tracks, and atmosphere of the old days(60s
through the mid-90s). The love of racing has been replaced by the love of more
and more money. The sponsors want more, the drivers want more, the track owners
want more, the businesses around the track want more, and on and on. When greed
rears its massive head, you have to know things are going to get worse before
they get better-if they ever do. I came to NASCAR in 1992, attended many races,
and now I rarely watch a race. too much fluff and not near enough substance.
mrfitts wrote on 11/26/2009 07:47:14 PM:
Being
originally from the NC and spending most of my 25 years in the Navy in the
Norfolk area. If you live past Richmond, like I have twice in my career. In the
Maryland area, they do not cover NASCAR like you do in this area of VA NC SC GA
Fla and Ala and the southern region. I say that because all you have to do is
read the newspaper, there is nothing, i mean nothing in the newspapers after
you pass richmond. It's a Southern Sport and you have taken it from its roots.
New Hampshire, all that track is a history or ruining the sports future. Dover
and Ponoco have unique racing, because of the tracks and the area's and people
go to those because they are within 6 hours from here, or less. The Cookie
Cutter tracks have ruined the racing, and the COT or shall I say the IROC Cars
that you have them drive do not even look like what is on the highways. The
Nationwide cars, that is going to be the series to watch, why? Look at what
they are putting on the track. Go back to your ROOTS! Please!
edneckjim wrote on 11/26/2009 06:44:26 PM:
i live in
spartanburg sc -i see cotton owens -david pearson almost everyweek-they are
what is missing in nascar-we have lost our roots to corporate money-bigger has
proven not to be better-when i watch the old races i can spot each driver by
make of car-now they all look alike-this year the races suck-who can watch
pocono w/o napping -who gives a rat patoot if we race in penn.or kansas
city--lets get back to north wilkesboro-the rock-
Dancynkc wrote on 11/26/2009 11:13:45 AM:
I've
said this before regarding the direction NASCAR has taken over the past several
years. When we became hooked in the late 80's, we were big time fans. Back
then, we couldn't decide which we liked least; Earnhart for his dirty tactics,
Waltrop for his mouth, or Wallace for his arrogance...but when it came down to
it, my wife and I always had a great time, and secretly, wished all the drivers
well. Today, NASCAR, with it's slick New York marketing, is much akin to the
movie "Electric Cowboy" where they drugged up, lit up, and in all
respect, lipstick'd up a hog (a good hog)to sell a product. A product by the
way that looks best without all the glimmer, lights, and lipstick; in fact,
string up some street lights, carve out a 1/4, to 1/2 mile track in the dirt,
and turn em loose. Cut back the number of races, elimate the cookie cutters
(KS, Chicago, Vegas), find some good dirt ever now and again, and turn em
loose. My wife and I have given up our seats at Talladega after 20 years
F4Epilot wrote on 11/26/2009 09:46:08 AM:
As the
saying goes, you hit the nail on the head. I didn't know anything about Nascar
until another Air Force cadet who was in flight training with me, took me to
his home on a 3 day pass. He was from Hickory Nc. This was the late 60's, went
to a race at Hickory and I was hooked on Nascar. After my tour in the service
was over from the mid 70's on I would fly 10 to 12 guys to races every year. We
flew to Darlington, Atanta, Rockingham, Dega, Daytona, Michigan, but mostly to
Charlotte. Now only 4 of us go and I'm in the cabin with the rest of the 150 or
so passengers. I still have 4 seats on the start/finish line in row 36 at
charlotte, but this past Oct may have been my last race. What I remember most
at Charlotte was Petty and Pearson side by side for 15 or 20 laps. You could
tell a Dodge from a Merc, and so what if they were 20 mph or so slower, sitting
in the stands you can't tell the speed difference. I think Nascar has lost it.
chuck8p wrote on 11/26/2009 07:11:34 AM:
Been
saying this for years. Get rid of Brian Frantz, and all of his cronnies and
people in that know and like racing. Dale E. said it years ago when they
brought out the restrictor plate,,if you are affraid to go fast and race then stay
home.
AmericanMade wrote on 11/26/2009 06:56:50 AM:
db been
saying that too for awhile but the little boy in grandpas chair will never fix all
the mistakes made and the sport will change to the point where it's completely
gone from what it was meant to be
dbhorne wrote on 11/25/2009 10:34:23 PM:
Excellent
article. I don't think I've read, or heard, anyone in the media articulate what
I've been thinking for some time the way this writer does in the above article.
NASCAR gained popularity with fans, mostly in the Southeast, due to great
door-to-door short track racing. Tracks like North Wilkesboro and Rockingham
made the sport what it WAS when people first started following the series. It
is a shame that those places didn't offer enough ticket revenue to remain a
part of the sport.
NASCAR needs someone calling the shots who understands what draws fans to the
sport and can resist the temptation to try short term fixes. The points system
was changed, a playoff system put in place, a new car debuted, double file
restarts, etc. None of that will ever replace short track beatin' and bangin'
for excitement.
ib wrote on 11/25/2009 09:05:36 PM:
|
Replying to chevyman (11/25/2009 08:39:15 PM): |
Boy that's the truth. I'll be the first to say we have to keep drivers safe but
there's got to be a way to do that and keep actual racing also. I've even
stopped recording the races. Use to if I had to be gone I'd set the vcr and
watch it as soon as I got home. No more; boy do I miss real racing.
chevyman wrote on 11/25/2009 08:39:15 PM:
|
Replying to ib (11/24/2009 09:13:35 PM): |
The problem for us old timers is that we have seen REAL RACING ( racing back to
the yellow, no pit road speed limits, drivers with a helmet & a pair of goggles
on, concrete walls,...). Racing was a dangerous business and we had respect for
the men (drivers & pit crewman) that would get out an take that risk eac
mietusgw wrote on 11/25/2009 07:35:30 PM:
Nascar
has gone the way of our politicians and that is to be politically correct,
giving up what made them what they were 10 or 15 years ago. Today, pre-race
concerts feature hard rock, what happened to the good old country music that
accompanied NASCAR's up-bringing. Races in California and west of the
Mississippi are staged for the liberals who can't see the forrest for the
trees. The only thing that the COT has done for NASCAR is to save the life of
the driver, which was evident again with Ryan Newman's crash at Talladega. By
far the COT is definitely a safer vehicle to drive, but at the same time it
creates for a boring race. I have watched NASCAR for the last 20 or so years
and now I find myself recording the races on TV so I can fast forward thru most
all of the race and all of the commercials.
runningboi wrote on 11/25/2009 07:08:12 PM:
That's
why I come here to get my NASCAR news (the few times there is any news). You
guys keep it real. It seems like the guys as NASCAR.com along with France and
Helton are delusional.
I live in Greensboro, grew up in Martinsville and went to my first race when
our high school band played the National Anthem back in 1990. I've been a fan
since, up until about 2-3 years ago.
I have checked out, turned off the lights, and left the building. However you
want to put it, I'm finished with NASCAR. This is from someone who has about 15
or so die cast cars (no COTs) and used to go to about 4-5 races a year. But, if
you list to France and others, it�s all about the economy. Many
corporations don't exist today because CEO's we bull-headed and didn't want to
change. I can see that happening to NASCAR.
Elijahken wrote on 11/25/2009 03:40:12 PM:
I believe the problem is that there is nothing stock car about nascar.
Nascar was fun when you could watch a race on Sunday and go buy the 'same' car
on Monday. Heck, they're not even 'cars'. A tube with a cookie cutter shell.
Fans could relate to T-birds, superbirds, grad prix, and such. Stock cars? How
many carburated cars are made now? None. How many Fusions with rear wheel drive
and a v8 can you buy? How many Cambry's are at the local race track? Nascar is
just like the government, regulate everything. Maybe if things were back to the
best car, the best driver, and the best mechanic wins, Nascar would mean
something again.
mythril57 wrote on 11/25/2009 02:44:25 PM:
NASCAR won't change unless companies money goes away. The political
correctness and not wanting to stir the pot comes from corporate $$ In the
"godd ole days" These drivers raced their cars on Sunday and probably
went to work the next day. Today's drivers know if they act out then their
gravy train can come to an end. I have no idea the answer to this, but how many
of these gus would be racing if they weren't making great money for it? The genie
is out of the bottle, we are not going back to lively personalities, we are not
going to see great racing until all of the big money leaves and it will be
reborn by someone other than BF. I will admit Homestead was pretty good to
watch but by and large the racing with the COT was not very compelling for this
year.
Have a nice day:)
GBDEMHMRGD wrote on 11/25/2009 01:56:20 PM:
Hey Colby! are you any kin to a former midget driver at Ascot Park in
Torrance, CA. I remember watching Colby Scroggins run the 1/4 mile in an old
110 offy back in the 60s
lila wrote on 11/25/2009 01:27:31 PM:
THERE HAVE BEEN LEGENDS AND OTHER VERY WELL KNOWN,LOVED DRIVERS IN THE
SO CALLED RECENT PAST , DALE , ELLIOTT, DAVEY , RUSTY AND OTHERS THAT ARE KNOW
LONGER OUT THERE ..THIS ALONG WITH THE VERY VALID POINTS YOU MADE AND THE NEW
BUNCH OF YOUNG DRIVERS THAT FOR WHAREVER THE REASON HAVE YET TO HAVE THE SAME
IMPACT AS THE GUYS MENTIONED ALONG WITH OTHERS ON BOTH OLD AND NEW FANS ..
RedBull2 wrote on 11/25/2009 12:13:58 PM:
I like the list method.
Reasons I have lost interest in NASCAR(and I actually like Jimmie)
1. Lucky Dog
2. Bruton Smith and his cookie-cutter track company
3. Brian France and corporate butt-kissing
4. Mike Helton/Robin Pemberton and the inconsistent rules enforcement
5. Announcers like Rusty Wallace and Brad Daugherty
6. Does anyone really ever know when the race is coming on? I swear sometimes I
expect them to just race on a Tuesday night to get a good TV slot.
thux45 wrote on 11/25/2009 12:03:42 PM:
Here are the reasons I have lost interest in Nascar;
1- Boring
2- No Petty on the track
3- Digger
4- Hollywood Hotel
5- Larry Mac
6- Pre Race Shows
Make it more about the racing!!!!
thebackdoor wrote on 11/25/2009 11:54:11 AM:
As long as you have bullies like Bruton Smith throwing their weight
around, and he has a lot, NASCAR is going to continue to decline. Everyone
seems to blame France, but in the South, Bruton is the single worst thing to
happen to racing in the last 10 years.
He is a fat, slob that thinks the $1000.00 glasses make him look cool, when in
fact he just looks like a overweight baby that throws his weight around when he
does not get his way.
One highlight, his net worth is a whole lot less today than 3 years ago and
it's droping each and every day which means he still has the weight to toss
around, but a lot less cash to keep it in the air.
zzazazz wrote on 11/25/2009 11:43:06 AM:
Well said, especially the last couple of paragraphs. I hadn't thought
about that but you are right, there is less casual discussion in Charlotte
about NASCAR than there used to be.
FanSinceThe60s wrote on 11/25/2009 11:10:28
AM:
Uh, that's "Bill France Sr. & Jr." in my previous post.
Sorry.
FanSinceThe60s wrote on 11/25/2009 11:09:23
AM:
Tom's article and every comment offered here represents a valid voice
NASCAR (e.g. the France family, esp. Brian) is choosing to ignore. NASCAR has
an "answer" for every fan objection, and they choose to listen only
to themselves, to those they hire, and to those who bring the "big"
money (as opposed to the over-inflated price of one ticket). When Bill France
Sr. & Sr., and pioneers like Richard Petty and even Dale Earnhardt, talked
about listening to the fans first, they meant it. Today's NASCAR just dredges
up lip-service quotes from the past as PR fodder, when in fact they are lying
through their collective teeth. They have chosen not to care about the fans,
and now the fans are returning the favor. There's no cure for stupid, nor for a
leader's lack of character.
nascarplumber40 wrote on 11/25/2009 10:34:11
AM:
It is about time someone told the truth .The good old boys abd gals have
left the building . Also the invite to have Toyota to race has stunk up the raceing
. look at how many on the air track color reporters and anchor people have
Toyota teams ?Most of them. You can say what you want but Toyota put the money
in the right places and bought out the sport .I know my self I have not been to
a race and I went to 3 or 4 a year ,have not been back.
Wizard_of_Iz wrote on 11/25/2009 09:55:55 AM:
Just maybe NASCAR has started back by standardizing the start times for
2010. But The Chase is a joke. At first, I viewed it as a way to get Junior
closer to Gordon and the other leaders. When it expanded to 12, I viewed it as
a way to get Jr. in the Chase at all. Now, it's run its course as an experiment
and should be scrapped. You sure can't compare records from another era to now.
Regarding the COT, NASCAR underestimated how much Fans enjoyed arguing and
complainig about "their" brand being better or worse than
"your" brand. Easy fix ... take the body off of a real car and put it
over a racing chassis and roll cage. The only modifications should be for
safety. And take the spoilers/wings off. It's not a racer's God-given right to
hold the pedal to the floor in every corner. The best races are the ones where
the driver has to lift every now and then --- like Richmond, Bristol, etc.
Plus, you would save on engine development because too much horsepower would be
a bad thing.
ColbyScroggins wrote on 11/25/2009 09:31:23
AM:
I grew up in a racing family in Indiana. Went to my first Cup race at
Charlotte in 1973 to see Petty, Yarborough, the Allison's, etc. That was back
when a Ford looked like a Ford, and a Chevy looked like a Chevy, and a Toyota
looked like a golf cart. With all of the rules changes to button up the field,
we've lost all the manufacturer's identity. Remember the old adage "win on
Sunday, sell on Monday"? Completey gone now. The light at the end of the
tunnel might be the new Busch car (take a hike Nationwide). I would still like
to see them stripped down more, though.
Jeff wrote on 11/25/2009 09:25:35 AM:
Followed this before Winston Cup to Sprint Cup for most of my 52 Years. The
Have teams, by that I mean teams that have the best setups which allows the
Racer to get the most speed onto the track, will win and dominate no matter
what the current rules are. When traditions are stepped over for progress you
have to pick your steps very carefully. There was some pretty good racing at
the smaller tracks that allowed some racing rubbing that where stepped over for
progress. To me the best racing is where the cars will slide around and tires
fall off after a few laps that will allow the speed of the car to be controlled
by the racer. Biggest thing that will stop me from watching a race is all of
those cautions that come out any time there is a large lead for something that
has been on the track for many laps. Because of the big money in Sprint Cup now
they have to race at venues that have all the amenities to entertain the
sponsors so in came all the new tracks that possessed great amenitie
RedBull2 wrote on 11/25/2009 09:16:30 AM:
Bruton "I'll take my track and move where I want to" Smith and
Brian France have been the driving forces behind the drop in NASCAR. Smith was
dumb enough to push out Humpy Wheeler, which should prove his insanity. Both
are so busy trying to make sure the marketing rights bring in the dollars that
they have forgotten the fans. Winston Cup to Nextel Cup to Sprint Cup. Busch
Series to Nationwide Series. Craftsman Truck Series to Camping World Truck
Series. DOES ANYONE EVEN REMEMBER THAT SERIES THEY ARE WATCHING THIS WEEK? The
drivers have become secondary, the fans have become a periphary concern...but
the almight $$$ rules the roost.
americafirs1 wrote on 11/25/2009 09:11:03 AM:
Brian France has ruined Nascar with the following;
COT
Toyota
Chase
Lucky Dog
Just to name a few reasons
RedBull2 wrote on 11/25/2009 09:10:59 AM:
North Wilkesboro, Rockingham, Darlington.....three prime examples of
what is missing in NASCAR these days. The old days of local tracks for
blue-collar race fans have gone and been replaced by luxury boxes and
multi-million dollar sponsorships. The real fans can't afford to attend a race,
and most don't want to show up on a Saturday night or Sunday at 6pm to see one.
NASCAR forgot that a 1pm race in the southeast was what paid the bills. Add to
that the fact that 50% of the crowd has pledged all allegiances to a guy who
has been a career 2nd tier driver, and you can see why the ratings have dropped
considerably.
PRW94 wrote on 11/25/2009 08:54:05 AM:
And finishing up since I ran out of room ... I don't think there's any
going back with the drivers either. With a few exceptions, a lot of these guys
are just as faceless and interchangeable as pro golfers or tennis players. And
they are multi-million-dollar businessmen, just like other pro athletes. I'm not
saying that they don't try hard and compete when they're racing, but racing is
just one part of most of those guys' empire. There is very little frame of
reference between them and middle and lower class Southerners who are the fan
base that made this sport what it was at its peak.
PRW94 wrote on 11/25/2009 08:50:47 AM:
In a former life, I covered NASCAR as a media member and was around
during the leadup to the big push to go beyond the South and go national. The
marketing folks who did this had the idea that NASCAR would become a major
sports league. I'm talking a major sports league equivalent to the NFL, Major
League Baseball, the NBA and the NFL. Not just the top racing series, but a
major sports league. I heard that literally from some of the horses' mouths. I
thought they were loony then and I've been proved right. There was never any
chance of NASCAR being a major sports league like the NFL, there never will be
any chance of NASCAR being a major sports league like the NFL. The big growth
spurt had no real foundation, as has been cited here. It was built on sand. It
was a pipe dream. And, to use another cliche, the chickens are coming home to
roost. The thing is, IMHO the sport has been so changed that I don't think
there is any going back.
therewhenitstarted wrote on 11/25/2009 08:36:02
AM:
Jus' git ova it!! Enjoy!
since74 wrote on 11/25/2009 08:31:38 AM:
Tom you're pretty much dead on. But at least as important as the move to
grow beyond the south, the chase has really aggravated the old time fans. Its
the stats that help blend the eras together, and now none of the history
matters. I mean, don't get me wrong, JJ is awesome. But his four championships
can't be compared to the champions from before. And vdeputy; its not rose
colored glasses. As a short time fan, you would have no idea. Sure there are a
lot of things that are better today, but they do not erase the blatant disrespect
for the fans from BRIAN FRANCE.
cltbobcatsfan wrote on 11/25/2009 08:30:07 AM:
When Bruton Smith & company stole the North Wilkesboro track from
wealthy locals a festering wound created for NASCAR. That would could
eventually kill the sport. North Wilkesboro is where the sport started and was
the soul of the sport. Bruton and manipulated a widow to steal the track and
its race dates from very wealthy Lowe's & Holly Farms heirs that would have
taken better care of the sport. The track dates were moved to poorly designed
dangerous tracks in cities with bandwagon fans. The hard core fans in the
southeast had their souls torn out and the bandwagon fans in other places are
moving on to the next bandwagon. Drive to North Wilkesboro and you can see the
old speedway rotting. Bruton & partners would not even let it be used as a
practice track. They will not dismantle it either. Just let it rot as a monument
to arrogance and stupidity.
FlatFootFred wrote on 11/25/2009 08:12:19 AM:
CocoaTom is crazy. You say NASCAR is boring then say you switch to
watching the most boring racing on the planet which is F1, ROFL. Now those are
boring races, except for the first 10 laps.
·
Face266 wrote on 11/25/2009 07:51:33 AM:
I agree with most of what Tom says, except the COT thing. When are
people gonna get it out of their head that the racing changed when they brought
in the new car? Well before they brought in the new car drivers were
complaining about clean air and ya know what? Most of the time it's nonsense
anyway. When you're 3 or 4 seconds behind the leader, you've got just as much
clean air as he does. Not to mention that alot of the tracks are multiple grooves.
If he's running low and you're running high, you ARE in clean air. They even
whine about it at Bristol and Martinsville, where any crew chief will tell you
that mechanical grip, not aero grip, is the premium. The good old days: where
victory margins were in laps instead of seconds. Get real people.
vdeputy wrote on 11/25/2009 07:42:20 AM:
My thoughts on NASCAR. I AM an older female Democrat (!) and I love
NASCAR. I am a relatively new fan so to me it is all fresh and bright. I don't
know anything but the Chase, the COT, today's drivers. I think for some people
on here, it is about their past and looking back with rose-colored glasses. You
remember things you did with your dad when you were small as the height of
perfection. Or being young and going to the races with friends. But it really
isn't NASCAR that's changed so much, it is you. New interests, new priorities.
The present day can't compare.
tuffbird wrote on 11/25/2009 05:26:47 AM:
I am "forty-something" and there are two reasons why I don't
follow NASCAR like I used to -- the new tracks (whether or not in the
Southeast) all look the same, and the television coverage during the first half
of the season is about "Ole DW,"Larry Mac," and Jeff Hammond; it
has very little to do with the racing. By the time the July 4 race at Daytona comes
around, I have lost interest.
SCfan wrote on 11/25/2009 05:22:23 AM:
Quite simply, Brian France, by coddling the corporate culture, took away
everything that made the sport popular to the fans. Now no one is happy, fans
are leaving, and sponsorship is hard to find. You can blame the economy, but if
you have a good product it helps to offset things. NASCAR no longer has a good
product. Thanks Brian, good job! Can someone please fire this goon?
JesseinLKN wrote on 11/25/2009 05:09:50 AM:
It does not help that the dominant race car driver (Jimmie Johnson) is
not very good at being a celebrity, nor that the biggest celebrity in NASCAR
(Dale, Jr.) is not very good at racing. It does not help that the collapse of
the US auto industry has deflated brand identity for the fans. It does not help
that the collapsed economy has affected NASCAR’s base, working people, far more
than fans of other sports. And, although we hate to admit it, it probably does
not help that safer cars have taken away some of the suspense.
It would help, on the other hand, to keep some perspective. The so-called
sparse attendance at any of the 150,000+ facilities would overflow Rockingham
or North Wilkesboro. The fan base today still far exceeds what it was “back in
the day,” before NASCAR was on nationwide TV. The crowds at Bristol when I was
growing up would fit into Time Warner Arena.
I for one continue to enjoy my NASCAR.
Antietum wrote on 11/24/2009 11:32:50 PM:
...I don't think the France family knows how to run a
business...(although they do seem to know how to reward family members with
high paying jobs)...ISCA has a P/E of 41 and pay 0.5% dividend...for the last
three years their numbers have been bad....their chart is pretty ugly:
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=isca&sid=0&o_symb=isca&freq=2&time=10&x=25&y=20
appstate98 wrote on 11/24/2009 11:27:32 PM:
NASCAR died on 2/18/01. Haven't watched it since.
Charlotte_Caniac wrote on 11/24/2009 11:22:52
PM:
I don't agree with you often, Tom, but you're spot on here. I got into
racing about 16 years ago. I still think that Nascar was still a pure southern
sport at that point. I used to travel to every Rockingham race myself because
it was a blast. Oh well. Nascar has lost the identity that made it popular in
the first place.
odb4040 wrote on 11/24/2009 11:10:10 PM:
Nascar forgot me. I am 34 years old.I am the guy whose father took him
to races at Martinsville,Rockingham,Darlington and other tracks in the south.
We would go to Sat night races at South Boston or Orange Co and have a great
time. I went to Daytona and watched Bobby Allision win the Fire Cracker 400 and
watched Petty, Waltrip and Allison. I know whom the Flock's are, Curtis Turner
and Fireball Roberts. My father wasn't highly educated but did alright for
himself. He provided me with a college education and I now make a six figure
income. I used to take friends to those same local tracks. I enjoyed explaining
the history of Nascar and the subtles of racing such as "go slow to go
fast." I enjoyed the rivialries and the hard racing. All of that is gone.
It's engineers, corporate sponsers and letting a guy go. Too many
"racers" complain about constraints of Nascar while also complaining
about guys racing them hard. Nascar forgot about me and I was here the whole
time.
BamBamSG wrote on 11/24/2009 10:54:36 PM:
I'm with you Tom. They've taken all the fun and excitement out of NASCAR
and even though I agree Jimmie Johnson has a "courteous corporate
image", that's part of the problem. NASCAR is sanitized enough to appeal
to female democrats who are members of Westchester Country Club. The only
problem is, they don't want it. Watch out for PBR (Prof Bull Riding). The bull
of tomorrow just keeps getting harder to ride, not aerodynamic. The
personalities may not be polished corporate spokespeople, but they never were
Junior Johnson either. I think that the cowboys of the PBR are the Dale
Earnhardt SRS of tomorrow.
CocoaTom wrote on 11/24/2009 10:12:49 PM:
I totally agree with you, Tom. NASCAR is boring boring boring--well,
except for Talladega and Daytona. I'm on the edge of my seat for those races.
But the rest are just so ho-hum. I am more interested in Formula One these
days, and they can thank NASCAR for that.
myet2002 wrote on 11/24/2009 10:10:39 PM:
I think you are right. I never missed a race at Texas, untill the first
race with the COT, and I haven't been to a cup race since. We have been to the
truck and nationwide races. Brian France, Mike Helton, and Robin Pemberton keep
repeatedly saying the competetion is the best its been in years, its just the
economy hurting the sport, blah blah blah. They may be able to make somewhat of
a case for the seats being empty due to the economy, but that don't wash with
the tv ratings. Boring races, rediculous rules, the COT- short for POS, not to
mention no testing allowed. That is like telling an NFL team they arent allowed
to practice before games. How good would that work?? Fance and Nascar need to
quit living in lala land and get real. Listen to the fans. They tell the
drivers what to say and not to say, but they don't control the fans, they just
ignore them.
jjjg wrote on 11/24/2009 09:20:00 PM:
Word! Jimmie isn't the problem, his making history this week was one of
the brightest spots in Nascar in YEARS. One of the rare positive things to
happen to this sport lately.
hawgy wrote on 11/24/2009 09:16:26 PM:
|
Replying to hawgy (11/24/2009 09:14:51 PM): |
sorry I left out TRUCK on the qualifying at Talledega
hawgy wrote on 11/24/2009 09:14:51 PM:
I do think your article is true, but From my point of view and 20 of my
closest friends, we quit going to the races because they have flooded the races
with rice burners. I will not spend my money to go see them win. Look at indy
car it went by the wayside when chevy and ford pulled out. I live within 45 minutes
of Texas Motor Speedway, I went to the ground breaking I had season tickets up
until 2005, All of my friends did whether they rooted for dodges, or fords or
chevies. That was the fun for bragging rights. I watched the qualifying at
talledega you would see one ford then 5 rice burners the a chevy and 6 toyotas
then maybe a dodge then three more toyotas then most of the go or go homers
were toyotas. it is almost as bad in nationwide and it will be in cup soon.
They will spend all the money to try to be on top, we are sick of them..I know
I know people say they are made in americia but the money goes back to them
over there in Japan. one day they will all be toyotas and no fans
ib wrote on 11/24/2009 09:13:35 PM:
The problem is that the races have turned into parade laps. When you
have 10 to 15 second intervals between the 1st. and 10th. place car that's not
racing. When you won't allow them to bump fenders when passing that's not
racing. When the first place car no matter who it is can pull away from the
field due to clean air something needs to be done that's not racing. BORING is
what it is.
Ó SCMSRN.com/Paul J Miller 3rd, 2000-2009